-- Ralph Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 28 June 2007, 03:10 PM -0500):
> There is an inconsistency here, and I am getting to the root of the problem.
> 
> PotatoBob wrote:
> > An example of this would be valid urls /foo/fooBar and /foo/foo_bar which
> > would route to the same action in controller foo and action fooBarAction().
> > The problem here is with ViewRenderer, it will use the action supplied in
> > the url for the name of the view script. So /foo/fooBar would render
> > fooBar.phtml while /foo/foo_bar would render 'foo_bar.phtml' this is a
> > problem because it would throw a 'cannot find view script' exception on a
> > valid url from the router's point of view.
> 
> There is a bug here.. basically if an action can be dispatched, then 
> there should be only one logical name for a view script based on 
> whatever convention is enforced at the ViewRenderer layer.

I think I know already what the bug is, and should be able to fix it
pretty easily. Please create a JIRA issue detailing the above so I can
resolve it.

Thanks!

-- 
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer            | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company   | http://www.zend.com/

Reply via email to