Alex, What's faster about .NET? Execution time? Even if that's true it hardly matters in web application. On average 95% is spend on http requests and frontend. With .NET you are more likely to end up with a bloated site, harder to tweak because you have less low level control over it. So the end effect can be much worse on .NET.
ps. I think I sent you a direct reply by accident, please disregard it. Cheers Karol Alex Netkachov wrote: > > On 10/6/07, Parnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think it is so much .Net vs ZF becaust .Net in itself is a >> pretty cool framework. >> >> The uncool part is: >> >> A) not open source > BTW: MS will make .NET source code available to debug in next version > of Visual Studio: http://www.alexatnet.com/node/87 >> B) dependent on IIS and MSSQL > Yes, .NET & MSSQL is fastest that I have ever seen. > C) .NET is faster. > >> PHP + ZF is: >> >> A) open source (free and large community if any examples/help is needed) >> B) can be run in just about any server environment > C) PHP usually requires less code for the same functionality if you > coding an algorithm or working with framework. Not types, type casts, > easy for's and so on. > >> >> > > Sincerely, > Alex > > -- > http://www.alexatnet.com/ - consulting, blog, articles and support for > PHP, ZF, JavaScript and web development. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/.Net-or-Zend-Framework--tf4580976s16154.html#a13077563 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
