On 10/13/07, cyberlot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (...) > In your case for example with lighttpd how would you propose we handle > "htaccess"? Maybe spit out a lighttpd.conf that holds whats needed to get > you going?
I actually never bother with .htaccess because IMO a production server should have all that in the webserver's config (e.g. httpd.conf) instead (for several reasons), so I am not sure if there is a htaccess-equivalent for lighttpd since I never looked for it. In any way, you could spit out a config file (e.g. "lighttpd-zf.conf") instead since lighttpd supports includes in its main configuration file. Till
