Ignore the fact that the ZF url is basically a bunch of parameters and say we were dealing with a real folder. In such a case example.com/A+Real+Folder is not the same as example.comA%20Real%20Folder, in fact, the first one gives me a 404 but I bet it works on some hosts.
If I remember correctly, urlencode() is meant to encode stuff for POST or GET, whereas rawurlencode() generates a normal url path. But since the URL's in ZF are a bunch of parameters and don't link to real files then is using urlencode() wrong or not? There used to be an explanation of the differences on php.net but it's gone now. I guess some digging through specs is needed but I don't know where to start. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Should-Zend_View_Helper_Url-use-rawurlencode%28%29--tf4956211s16154.html#a14192829 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
