-- Ralph Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 24 January 2008, 05:30 PM -0800):
> How about
>
> <?
>
> /**
> * @DEPRECATED
> */
> class Zend_Controller_Action extends Zend_Controller_Action_Abstract
> {}
>
>
>
> I have a +1 on making _Abstract a coding standard (as well as _Interface ;)
> )
I like the idea, don't get me wrong -- I just don't want to break
people's applications, and I don't want people to get the idea they can
have a concrete instance of Zend_Controller_Action. Maybe for 2.0. :-)
> > In this particular case, Zend_Controller_Action is one of the first
> > classes ever added to the framework, and the '_Abstract'convention was
> > started much later. We considered renaming it at one point, but it would
> > have broken enough existing code by users of the framework that we
> > deemed it not worthwhile (and making Zend_Controller_Action a concrete
> > class extending Zend_Controller_Action_Abstract would have been a bad
> > move as it doesn't follow the naming conventions for concrete controller
> > classes).
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
