<commercial ad so don't read on if you prefer not to :)> You may also want to take a look at Zend Platform 3.6 which we just released (http://www.zend.com/en/products/platform/) besides byte-code-caching it also has a lot of additional scalability features including easy to configure URL-based caching (nice for Zend Framework), PHP Intellgence (white box monitoring & root cause analysis) for finding and easily resolving bottlenecks and problems in production, and some other cool features like a download server & job queue. It's a great environment for business-critical apps (yes, I am bias of course so don't trust a word I say :)
</commercial ad....> Andi > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Freudenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 9:11 AM > To: 'Hervé Piedvache'; [email protected] > Cc: 'Nogyara' > Subject: RE: [fw-general] Zend Framework performance for real > application? > > But you're not using the mvc part of zend framework, are you? I'm > wondering > how you would archive more than 125 requests / second on each node > while > using the mvc part. > > Best regards, > Daniel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hervé Piedvache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 6:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Nogyara > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework performance for real > application? > > Yep mananing 2 big services all in ZF one with 6 web servers and the > other > with 2 web servers and I have most of the time 1000 requests per > seconds > with > APC and memcache ;o) > > Le samedi 26 janvier 2008, Nogyara a écrit : > > Perfect, thanks for your tips, I'll use APC as Zend_Cache backend > then. > > > > And about the second part of the question, do you think that ZF can > handle > > with APC's support let's say 10-15 request per second? Has anyone > some > > experince about this which (s)he would like to share? > > > > Fabien MARTY wrote: > > >> And one more question, I didn't study Zend_Cache yet, but which > backend > > >> do > > >> you think is the best for maximum performance? > > > > > > APC backend is the best (datas are stored in shared memory) > > > > > > memcached backend is also a good choice if you have several > webservers > > > (the cache can shared) > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Fabien MARTY > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Hervé Piedvache
