-- Joó Ádám <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 04:48 PM +0100): > The problem is that I created issues for these, but were either marked > as fixed (Zend_Controller_Action) but are still untouched, or fixed > but after releasing new components, mark them the same way (Zend_View > helpers). > Anyway, I'll post again.
Don't post again, but instead re-open the issue, and note why you're re-opening it. (The Zend_Controller and Zend_View ones were not ones I dealt with, but were instead dealt with by community members.) Make sure you're explicit that these relate to the @subpackage docblock tags. > On Jan 30, 2008 2:26 PM, Darby Felton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Ádám, > > > > Indeed, such inconsistencies are less than ideal. Please feel free to > > create JIRA issues for these inconsistencies, so that they may be > > tracked and addressed. > > > > Thank you for the report! > > > > Best regards, > > Darby > > > > > > Joó Ádám wrote: > > > Hello List, > > > > > > I'd like to call developers attention to the regular inconsistencies > > > between subpackage names in several components. An example for this > > > are view helpers: some of them has 'helper' as a subpackage name, > > > while the others has 'helpers'. It should be decided that singular or > > > plural is the preferred form, and use the chosen consequently. > > > IMHO singular would be better, 'caus it reflects the singular form > > > used in the directory structure/class prefixes. > > > > > > There are also other places where tags aren't used consequently, e. g. > > > the controller component, where one can find subpackages > > > 'Action_Helper' (third variation) and both 'Action' and > > > 'Zend_Controller_Action'. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
