That's a known ie7 issue that we hope to have solved later this week.

 

Thanks for reporting it, tho!

,Wil

 

From: Alan Wagstaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [fw-general] And a big thanks to Varien for the new site
design!

 

Since we are on the subject of the new site (which I love by the way)
and the 3 blocks, I have a problem that I've been meaning to mention for
a while now.

 

When the page is loading, the "Make the Choice", "Get Started" and "Give
Back" headers appear fine:

 

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j49/citalan/zf-site/loading.png

 

But once the page is loaded, the text grows and overlaps:

 

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j49/citalan/zf-site/complete.png

 

Haven't noticed it anywhere else on the site, just on the homepage
there.  Running IE7 on Vista with a 1280 x 800 resolution.

 

Alan

 

On 07/04/2008, Wil Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

OK, I'm the one to blame for the 3 color-coded sections. J And most of
those dorky taglines. Of course, I make absolutely no claims of
non-dorkiness. :D

I don't see 'Make the Choice' as challenging, but do you have a
suggestion? BTW, this box is supposed to be for decision makers. The
center one is for developers, and the right one is targeted at
contributors.

CodeIgniter's site is definitely good. But I wouldn't green-light
something like this for ZF because I think there is far too much text
for a front page and is extremely developer centric.

Site conception and color-differentiated boxes were originally proposed
by me. I can assure you that I haven't seen the current opensuse.org
<http://opensuse.org/>  site. BTW, that horizontal, 3-box format is very
popular right now. I have seen the current version of the RoR site:
http://www.rubyonrails.org/. It's 4 items, but you get the idea. J
Sometimes designs become popular because they work well; I believe
that's the case here, but it's pretty subjective.

I'm glad you like the inside pages. We tried to keep them strictly
content-driven. We may add the occasional icon to liven up the text a
bit.

I really don't like the phpdoctrine.org <http://phpdoctrine.org/>  site
for several reasons, but I don't want to make this discussion to turn in
to a list of criticisms of other people's sites. ;)

CakePHP's site isn't my favorite, but it seems relatively effective to
me.

Please keep in mind that we are also addressing decision makers with
technical skills all across the board. I've said it before, and I'll say
it again: the Zend Framework project is great for large corporate sites
and enterprise applications. In fact, among PHP frameworks, I think
these are some of our sweet spots. Decision makers want to see our case
studies and what services we offer. We have been careful to wear the
commercial side of the project on our sleeves- even on the old site from
long before I joined the project. Ultimately, we hope ZF works as well
for enterprise customers as it does for one developer's personal or
hobby site.

Could it be that some of this criticism might be directed at the fact
that our site isn't designed for just developers? Maybe we took on too
much by trying to address 3 stakeholders with the same design. Please
don't take my answers as deflections of your comments- I'm taking this
all as feedback. The fact is that we'll never have a site that everyone
likes. J

 

,Wil

 

From: Karl Katzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 10:32 AM
To: Wil Sinclair
Cc: [email protected] 


Subject: Re: [fw-general] And a big thanks to Varien for the new site
design!

 

Wil, 

I'm not a big fan of the new site's homepage either. Let me try and
explain why, from both a design perspective and a usability perspective.


On the front page, everything is cartoony and oversized. The icons are
big, the fonts are far too big, the ZF logo (which is normally rather
slick) is big and embossed, the "MAKE THE CHOICE" is the biggest and
first thing you see. Those are challenge words, not welcoming words. The
color scheme clashes and calls your attention to too many things at
once. There are far too many choices on the front page for anyone to
find where they should get started. The subheadings under "Make the
choice / get started / give back" are dorky and un-necessary. How do you
know what feels good to me? ;) 

Compare this to CodeIgniter's site: http://codeigniter.com/ ... the
color scheme is bright in areas where it wants to call your attention.
The first thing you read is a description of what CodeIgniter is, the
second is a welcome message. The icons are understated and are small
enough to not clash. You can scan the site easily and figure out where
you need to go. 

On top of all the other sins we have unoriginality; the "Make the
choice, get started, and give back" tricolor scheme seems to have been
stolen directly from OpenSuse.org, which does it far better... they only
give you three choices until you've decided if you're there to download,
there for information, or there to contribute to the software factory.
(I realize they're not the same exact colors, but that's the first thing
I thought when I saw the blue top with the orange and green.) 

On the other hand, the inside pages are nice. I like the use of a block
serif font. I like the tabbed menu. I like the organized layout. The
font size is readable. 

We take the good with the bad, but I have a feeling that Code Igniter's
website and websites like phpdoctrine.org <http://phpdoctrine.org/>
should be used as examples. Those sites are well-organized and appeal to
both decision makers and developers. Then again, it's not like the
competition's stiff -- CakePHP's site has many of the same sins we do,
and Symfony's site looks like garbage. 

-K 

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Wil Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I gotta say- it's awesome that we have a forum where we can agree,
disagree, and generally figure out every way we can make the project
better.
OK, here's my take on the front page:
'1.5' will represent all the 1.5 releases; in my experience this is
common for less detailed pages. It really is meant to call out that
we've moved on from the 1.0 branch.
Keep in mind, this page may simply not be for you. It is dominated by
formatting and is meant to put the best face on ZF to new decision
makers, developers, and contributors. We've tried to make the other
pages more content driven, but it is safe to assume most of the content
on the main site PHP site will be more or less introductory. The tools
(wiki, IT, etc.) we have and will continue to keep as effective as
possible for our active users/contributors.
Ultimately, you haven't yet convinced me that the front page is not
effective at what it sets out to do. For example, having a prominent
download button makes it easy for everyone to download the project and
get started, which is exactly what we want new users to do.
Do you have more feedback on the site that might help us improve it? We
will be adding more improvements over the next few weeks as we get it to
a state we can be happy with until the next big update.

Thanks!
,Wil


> -----Original Message-----
> From: thurting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [fw-general] And a big thanks to Varien for the new site
> design!
>
>
> I'm going to have to disagree here.  The front page is an atrocity.
> The
> download header dominates, the logo is out of control, and it is
> incredibly
> hard to scan the page for information.  Also, the project is on
version
> 1.5.1 now.  You need to update the .jpg because that is where this
> pivotal
> and dynamic information is displayed.
>
>
> Amr Mostafa wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for making us look like rock stars, Varien! ;-)
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Wil Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> . . .and that's what I wish I would have remembered to say in the
> 1.5
> >> announcement. :/ Seriously, they did an excellent job on the
design;
> we
> >> asked them to take the ZF site to a completely new level, and I
> think
> >> most people would agree they did just that. This is one BIG way
that
> >> they give back to the ZF project. Thanks SO much, guys.
> >>
> >> ,Wil
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/And-a-big-thanks-
> to-Varien-for-the-new-site-design%21-tp16105849p16535205.html
> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 

 

Reply via email to