The following is a great example of feedback that should be posted as a comment on the proposal itself. Please remember that proposal announcements to the list are only meant to get you over to the proposal itself so you can start commenting there. :)
,Wil > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael B Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:15 PM > To: Pádraic Brady > Cc: Zend Framework General > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Crypt_Rsa Proposed: Community comment > welcome > > On 6/12/08, Pádraic Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have finished my proposal for a Zend_Crypt_Rsa component, which > will come > > in handy for a few uses, not least of which OAuth. > > > > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3866770 > > > > Comments from the community is more than welcome. As it stands the > component > > is quite a neat OO wrapper around existing ext/openssl functionality. > > The naming of this component is wrong. It should be > Zend_Pki_Certificate or Zend_Pki_Key or some such. The word "Crypt" > should be reserved for a generic crypto class and "Rsa" is just one > implementation of a symmetric algorithm. > > Also as long as I'm on a rampage, I will say I'm not a big fan of OO > wrappers for the sake of OOP as if it is somehow inherently superior > to just using an existing set of functions. What functional benefit > does this API have over the builtin openssl API? > > Mike > > -- > Michael B Allen > PHP Active Directory SPNEGO SSO > http://www.ioplex.com/
