Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: > > Also, please remember that these are done without any caching -- opcode > or content. They are meant as baseline comparisons only -- what is the > base performance of each given framework. > > Just for those who aren't regulars on the list, we are planning a > performance audit of ZF for 1.7.0, so hopefully the decreases seen over > time will turn around for you. >
IMO tests done without opcode caching are useless. Anyway, this only shows that some frameworks are better optimized to display "hello world" than others. Now all "hello world" developers can rejoice and switch to solar, we should be happy for them. Sarcasm aside, I'm sure most people here will agree that there's more to a framework than "baseline performance" and those benchmarks just give people the wrong ideas. There will be plenty of chances to improve ZF performance, but so far focus seemed to be on adding features. Just keep up the good work. Karol -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FYI%3A-new-php-framework-benchmarks-tp19257910p19262039.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
