Hey Bart,

they are up again. my webserver had an unexpected downtime yesterday. :-)

On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:27:05 Bart McLeod wrote:
> Hello Benjamin,
>
> Thanks a lot for pointing this out - and Matthew, sorry for not stopping
> the thread. It's just freaking hard to keep up with all the development
> going on :-) .
>
> I will take a look at it for sure. However, the links you provide are dead:
>
> www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/
> www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php
>
> that is, right now they are offline. I would like to take a look at your
> demo's before anything else!
>
> Regards,
>
> Bart McLeod
>
> Benjamin Eberlei schreef:
> > Hello Bart,
> >
> > i have already put together two proposal concerning jQuery support, one
> > for a generic helper that takes care of loading jQuery from CDN or local
> > path and takes care of a document ready (on load) execution stack.
> >
> > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_JQ
> >uery+-+Benjamin+Eberlei
> >
> > then a jQuery UI proposal, which allows integration of some of the jQuery
> > UI widgets as part of view helpers and form elements into your ZF app.
> >
> > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+Ext
> >ension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei
> >
> > personally i think, jQuery is frikking easy, so its probably good to just
> > write the code yourself, but some of the helpers i put together really
> > take some work from you and help you to build an application using jQuery
> > fast. they also group all the jQuery code together so that you don't have
> > little js snippets layign around your views everywhere.
> >
> > you might want to have a look at:
> > www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/
> > www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php
> >
> > which shows two examples of how the jQuery view helpers work.
> >
> > any feedback is appreciated, although the components have reached final
> > status and are finished and checked into zend framework extras incubator
> > already:
> >
> > http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/extras/incubator/library/ZendX/
> >
> > the documentation is also finished, if you want to get some hints at how
> > it all works.
> >
> > greetings,
> > Benjamin
> >
> > On Tuesday 16 September 2008 11:33:57 Bart McLeod wrote:
> >> I have used jquery with Zend_Form, before Dojo was integrated and I
> >> still use jquery. I would welcome integration of jquery too. However, I
> >> must admit that I did not even try Dojo, because I found the interface
> >> intimidating, the way it is described in the online reference guide. I
> >> will try it though and then decide if I still want to use jquery. I do
> >> not like the idea of having two different Ajax libraries in use in one
> >> system and I do like the idea of out-of-the-box Ajax functionality. If I
> >> read through jquery documentation, I understand it immediately. I think
> >> it's idea of simplicity matches that of ZF, which cannot be said of the
> >> list of functions available in Dojo. But there's no use crying over
> >> spilled water, if any. Wil is right of course, if we like jquery that
> >> much, let's put together a decent proposal.
> >>
> >> Bart McLeod
> >>
> >> Wil Sinclair schreef:
> >>> There are lots of reasons that Zend chose to partner with the Dojo
> >>> Foundation. But we realize that some developers prefer other JavaScript
> >>> toolkits, and that's why we'd never force our users to work with any
> >>> particular toolkit. Zend has chosen Dojo to contribute out-of-the-box
> >>> AJAX functionality to Zend, while at the same time making it clear that
> >>> we will welcome contributions from the community to support other
> >>> toolkits. In fact, there are a couple of proposals for JQuery
> >>> integration that are pretty far along now:
> >>>
> >>> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_
> >>>J Query+-+Benjamin+Eberlei
> >>> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+E
> >>>x tension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei
> >>>
> >>> If there is a JS Toolkit that you prefer to Dojo, I wholeheartedly and
> >>> sincerely recommend that you look in to creating your own proposal.
> >>>
> >>> ,Wil
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: zuhair.naqvi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 8:46 PM
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Why dojo of all? Whats wrong with an MIT license? To be frank Dojo is
> >>>> the
> >>>> shittest JS framework i've ever worked with. Both its code and design
> >>>> philosophy are no match for competition like jQuery or Prototype.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've moved from Symfony to ZF and prefer ZF even over ROR and was very
> >>>> excited to hear about a client library integration but I am shocked to
> >>>> see
> >>>> Dojo instead of others which are miles ahead of it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please explain...
> >>>> --
> >>>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/Why-Dojo-of-All----
> >>>
> >>>> tp19504841p19504841.html
> >>>> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Benjamin Eberlei
http://www.beberlei.de

Reply via email to