Ah, OK. Thanks for the response. FYI, last month Cal accepted a job in the Netherlands. I'm sure that's probably holding up your proposal.
http://www.ibuildings.com/news/?story=111 -Matt On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Bart McLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry Matt, for seeing your question so late. > > I would like to write a tutorial on devzone about those tricks, but my > proposal about that is still under review (Matthew, Cal?). > > It comes down to delegating the responsibility for adding decorators to a > small set of classes that know how to add decorators well. They are > organized in such a way that you can group form elements in any way your > like, without having to worry about decorators. If you require a new way of > grouping elements, you extend one of those classes to suit your needs and > never have to worry about decorators again. The tricky part is, that with > jquery (and dojo?), these classes will have to check if a jquery decorator > is present and preserve that. After I arranged this, I still got the error > of argument 4 not being an array. The solution to that is in my mail posted > earlier today. > > Regards, > > Bart > > Matthew Ratzloff schreef: > > It would have been nice if this element would have been completely >> compatible with all the tricks I play. >> > > What tricks are those? > -Matt > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Bart McLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> Yes and no. I know where to look to find out what is happening. It would >> have been nice if this element would have been completely compatible with >> all the tricks I play. For now, just close the bugreport. If I find a >> compatibility issue later, that I can describe more properly, I will let you >> know. >> >> At the moment, I am a little sad that using jquery directly is simpler >> than using its' ZF integrated counterpart. I was expecting the >> opposite...but I will not give up yet. >> >> Regards, >> >> Bart >> >> Benjamin Eberlei schreef: >> >> so this is not at all ZendX_JQuery related? its due to your own form >> implementation? i have already created a bug report, i will close it then if >> you can confirm that. >> >> On Thursday 23 October 2008 23:31:41 Bart McLeod wrote: >> >> >> By now, I found that the error is due to some internal magic I use for >> my forms. Still a strange error. >> I was able to use a ZendX_JQuery_Form_Element_Datepicker, named 'begin' >> in a regular form that has no magic to it. >> >> Bart >> >> Bart McLeod schreef: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> $elem = new ZendX_JQuery_Form_Element_DatePicker("begin", >> "12.12.2007", array(), array()); >> $elem->setJQueryParam('dateFormat', 'dd.mm.yy'); >> $this->addElement($elem); >> >> yields: >> *Catchable fatal error*: Argument 4 passed to >> ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_DatePicker::datePicker() must be an array, >> null given in >> *E:\ZendFramework\library\ZendX\JQuery\View\Helper\DatePicker.php* on >> line *54 >> >> *while: >> >> $elem = new ZendX_JQuery_Form_Element_DatePicker("*begin1*", >> "12.12.2007", array(), array()); >> $elem->setJQueryParam('dateFormat', 'dd.mm.yy'); >> $this->addElement($elem); >> >> gets a datepicker. See the difference? The id! The id cannot be called >> 'begin'. It can be called 'begin1'. Maybe there is something in my >> form magic that it causing this. So I should try this without any >> magic, in a very simple form. Wanted to share it with you before I >> forget. >> >> Bart >> >> >> >
