Hi Karol, How do you handle issue/bug tracking?
In Bugzilla I can choose the Product and then the component etc. More research tonight has unveiled the following projects: 1) Redmine (seems to be like Trac but written in Ruby). Not used Ruby or Rails so not comfortable with this from a systems managament POV. See Item 3! 2) I used Gforge on the Mambo project, they now over an Advanced Version: http://gforgegroup.com/es/download.php 3) Retrospectiva - but look at the 'Quick'???? Install guide: http://retrospectiva.org/wiki/Quick%20install. Now I know why I love PHP ;-) I think I am now getting myself down to Gforge AS or Trac. Why is nothing ever easy, eh? - Robert -----Original Message----- From: Karol Grecki [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 21 December 2008 21:46 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [fw-general] What do you use to manage your ZF projects? Robert I had the same problem over a year ago and settled for Trac. It doesn't support multiple projects but we use milestones for it e.g. "project A sprint 1".... It integrates really well with Subversion and there's a lot of plugins extending its functionality. It may still be your best bet if you don't find anything matching all your requirements. Karol rcastley wrote: > > Hi, > > Just curious here. I/we currently use Bugzilla & CVS, no formal wiki > but I do have a MediaWiki used for somethings. > > I am looking for a solution that fits all, so the obvious choices are > 'Trac' > like. > > My problem is that I need a solution that will support multiple projects. > (Trac doesn't score well in this area.) > > Bugzilla is used by multiple PHP, Java & C/C++ products. CVS is used > only by PHP developers the 'others' use VSS. > MediaWiki is used for 'sparse' documentation. > > > My gripes with the current setup: > > Bugzilla - v. slow and ugly but it fitted the bill at the time. > CVS - I like, no love, CVS but I know that there are better solutions > out there but am concerned about migration etc. > MediaWiki - Probably too much of an overkill for what we need and it > is not that easy to configured, extend etc. > > I now that the ZF team uses JIRA, Confluence etc but I have a budget > of £0/$0 :-) and don't qualify for the OS licenses. > > So ... I would be interested on the views of others of a 'one hat fits > all' > solution that can handle multiple projects. > The solution needs to offer Issues/Bug tracking and Wiki at a minimum. > Integration with SCM not important but if it does it great. > > I would prefer a PHP based solution but happy to consider others i.e. > Ruby, > Perl, Java etc. > > - Robert > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the > MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus > protection system. > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-do-you-use-to-manage-your-ZF-projects--tp21118310 p21119561.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system. ________________________________________________________________________
