Hi Bradley,
Sorry about the confusion, I misread your requirement.  The -1 trick is in
fact not an intended feature (if it were, it would be 0, to be in line with
typical PHP API), but if it works, use it for now.  Whatever fix will just
test for < 1, so your code should be forward-compatible.

I highly encourage you to file an enhancement ticket so that this can be
implemented properly.  If you do, please copy and paste this e-mail exchange
as a comment into the ticket.

Thanks,

-Matt

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Bradley Holt
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Matt,
>
> Taking a closer look at the documentation, the "All" scrolling style
> "returns every page." I'm not trying to show every page in the
> paginator control, I'm trying to have an infinite item count *per
> page* (which, of course, will make it so I have only one page of
> items). Like I said, passing a negative one (-1) to the
> setItemCountPerPage method does the job - I just don't know if this is
> an intended feature or something that just happens to work now but may
> not be supported in the future.
>
> Thanks,
> Bradley
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Matthew Ratzloff
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bradley,
> > Use the scrolling style "All" instead.
> > Please see http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.paginator.usage.htmlfor 
> > more information.
> > -Matt
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Bradley Holt <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was looking for a way to have Zend_Paginator show all of the items.
> >> For example, I have a selector that allows a user to show 25, 50, 100,
> >> or all records. I couldn't find any documentation but by experimenting
> >> I found that I could pass a negative one (-1) to setItemCountPerPage
> >> and it would show all items (actually, I think any negative number
> >> will show all items). Since I couldn't find any documentation on this
> >> I'm wondering if this is a supported feature of Zend_Paginator that
> >> just happens to work now but might break in the future.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bradley
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bradley Holt
> >> [email protected]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bradley Holt
> [email protected]
>

Reply via email to