Forget what I've said, I'm not going to merge it since there is a
conflict that I feel I am not able to resolve. So please, Wade, you do
the honors.

(Merging in a nutshell: cd ZF-Branch && svn merge ../zf-tr...@14005
../zf-tr...@14006)

Best regards,
Tobias

2009/2/12 Tobias Gies <[email protected]>:
> Hey Wade,
>
> For code to be part of a release version, you also have to merge your
> changes to the relevant release branch. So seeing as you commited the
> changes in r14006, your next action should have been to merge the
> changes made in r14006 to the release-1.7 branch. I'll merge the
> changes later this day.
>
> Best regards,
> Tobias
>
> 2009/2/12 Wade Arnold <[email protected]>:
>> I am not sure what I did wrong here. I checked in the code to trunk. It
>> seems like I set it to 1.7.4 rather than next mini version. Please let me
>> know what I can do in order to get this into the next mini release.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Wade
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/12/09 4:27 AM, "Tobias Gies" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The "fix for" attribute of this issue is indeed misleading. AFAIK,
>>> these get set automatically on release, but alas, they are not always
>>> true.
>>>
>>> Wade, please decide what to do by 7PM UTC. If I hear nothing from you,
>>> I'll merge the patch to the release branch.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> 2009/2/12 Dirk Thomas / 4wd media <[email protected]>:
>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I really forgot about the issue.
>>>>
>>>> no problem - you don't have to apologize.
>>>>
>>>>> If it's already in trunk, Wade
>>>>>
>>>>> will have to decide if it should be merged to the release branch.
>>>>
>>>> The point is that the issue is is targeted for 1.7.4 in the tracker.
>>>>
>>>> How do you keep track which things to merge?
>>>> In our company the issue is not closed until it has been fixed AND merged
>>>> (to any branches required to).
>>>>
>>>> If i would know how this is handled for Zend Framework i would may be just
>>>> keep quiet when i know that the issue is still remembered for merging...
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Dirk
>>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to