I agree, modules (and auth and acl) should be added to the QuickStart or some other Zend provided example. I can't think of any real world application that will not need these three additional capabilities.
- Steve W. Vince42 wrote: > > Hi, > > Dalibor Karlović schrieb: >> I think we should rethink this as it's obvious many people use the >> default module just like any other so the behavior should be as >> expected, even if adding an additional option. > > I circumvented this odd behaviour with > > http://paste2.org/p/284720 > > but I think that this is ugly and - if not provided otherwise - ZF > should treat the default module exactly as you described it and > everybody would expect it to work. > > Unfortunately the Quickstart is omitting the module topic - and I really > think that the module approach should be enforced as it leaves much more > room for flexibility, self-contained / autarchic modules etc ... just my > two cents. :) > > -- > Cheers, \\|// > Vince (o o) > ----------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo------------------------- > ''' (o)_(o) [ ][0][ ] > ô¿ô (=°o°=) World Domination by Copy and Paste [ ][ ][0] > - (")_(") [0][0][0] > > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments > Ooo. > ---------------------------.ooO----( )------------------------- > ( ) (_/ > \_) > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Default-Module---Bootstrapping-and-Models-tp24211701p24222781.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
