While distro/php versions probably will always be a factor to some degree, putting too much weight on that as a deciding factor will lead to stagnation. RHEL and CentOS, arguably the most 'enterprise' of Linux distros, still only officially support PHP 5.1.6, IIRC. Yes, you can upgrade from other repos, but I think you lose whatever 'enterprise support' you might get (probably not as much of a concern for the CentOS users).
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Mario Guenterberg < [email protected]> wrote: > On So, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:52:55 -0400, mbneto wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > > > I think it is too speculative to talk about a 5.3 only. A few days ago > > Mathew mentioned that no major distro (at least the 'enterprise') are > using > > the 5.3 version so I think that this will be a bad move, unless they do > not > > plan to release the new version (ZF 2.0) for a year or so. > > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Vincent de Lau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I think it is saver to assume that 2.0 *will* break existing stuff. > There > > > are some major changes planned, like renaming classes. I wouldn’t be > > > surprised if ZF 2.0 is PHP 5.3 only (namespaces). > > > > > > > > > > > > There used to be a roadmap on the website (page still exists but > doesn’t > > > seem to be linked to). Maybe it would be a good idea to reinstate this > page > > > and add (preliminary) information about 2.0? > > I mean that Matthew has written about the 2.0 release some weeks > ago. The relase plan is scheduled for mid 2010, I remember. > > And if so, than it make sense to support PHP 5.3 only. > My 2 cents. > > Greetings > Mario > > -- > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.12 > GCS/CM d- s++: a+ C++++>$ UBL*++++$ P++ L+++ E--- W+++ N+ o-- K- w O- M- > V-- PS++ PE++ Y PGP+++ t--- 5 X++++ R++ tv- b+++ DI D++++ G++ e* h---- > r+++ y++++ > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > -- Michael Kimsal http://jsmag.com - for javascript developers http://groovymag.com - for groovy developers 919.827.4724
