Thanks - That was useful indeed.

--
troels

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Paul M Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 14:02 , troels knak-nielsen wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm looking into replacing a legacy system with Zend_Db + subpackages
>> (Zend_Db_Table and friends), but I'm running into some problems. The
>> setup we have is a master/slave. For offloading the main server all
>> read queries are channelled to the slave, while all write queries are
>> sent to the main server. The current library supports this by allowing
>> each method to fetch the appropriate link. From what I can see, there
>> is no direct support for such a thing in Zend_db_Table, but I can see
>> a couple of possible flex points in the framework.
>>
>> Before I start off a tangent myself, I was wondering if anybody else
>> have tried something like this?
>
> Hi Troels,
>
> You may find this earlier thread useful:
>
>  http://www.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-Master-Slave-Db-w--ZF--td24179039.html
>
> In particular there is this bit about Solar, which obviously is not Zend
> Framework but may provide useful hints.
>
>  http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Best-practice-for-Master-Slave-Db-w--ZF--p24204672.html
>
>> <selfpromotion>
>>
>> This is as opposed to Solar's MysqlReplicated adapter, the SVN trunk
>> version of which works automatically.  Yes, it examines the first few
>> characters of the SQL statement to determine whether it should pick a
>> master or a slave, which is not exactly a big performance drain.  It
>> also manages GET-after-POST situations, so that if you insert or
>> update on one request, the very next request *also* uses the master
>> (even for reads), to allow time for data propagation to slaves.
>> Finally, you can switch back and forth between replicated and non-
>> replicated environments without changing your application code.
>>
>> See more here:
>>
>>   http://solarphp.com/blog/read/19-adapter-for-master-slave-my-sql-setups
>>
>> </selfpromotion>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul M. Jones
> http://paul-m-jones.com/
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to