According to either tool, CruiseControl and Xinc, there is a component
I'm missing, SCM. Since I'm the only developer, I never thought of
using something like Subversion or CVS, but now I think I should
rethink my strategy. Do most people use the following programming
model (pardon the horrible ASCII art), even if they are the only
developer:
Local copy of code <------> Local Apache(or IIS)/PHP
|
|
-> SCM (Subversion, CVS, etc)
|
|
-> CruiseControl/phpUnderControl or Xinc -----> Dev Server
----> QA Server ------> Front Ends 1 & 2
Thank you,
Henry
On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Michael Kliewe wrote:
Hi,
the last commit to Xinc is from 2008.
I prefer CruiseControl + phpUnderControl for my PHP projects.
http://phpundercontrol.org
Then you are able to automate deployment (where you can automate
things like removing a webserver from the pool, deploy the new files
to that server, and bring it back into the pool etc.)
Michael
On Nov 18, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Daniel Latter wrote:
Hi,
I have not used it but you may want to look at : xinc integtration
server (http://code.google.com/p/xinc/)
Dan
2009/11/18 Henry Umansky <[email protected]>
Hello all,
This is not a question regarding ZF per se, I just want to know how
others would handle the same situation. Currently I was given a
task to develop a PHP ZF app on a Windows Server 2k8 running IIS7.
Problem is that I'm using Mac Leopard and connecting to windows
using SMB through the Zend Studios 6.1 IDE. This process is
painfully slow, every key stroke takes about 3-5 seconds to
register and connecting to SMB before I open ZS is an extra step I
would like to cut out. I've isolated the problem to Zend Studios,
since other text editors like TextWrangler or Komodo Edit are fine.
So my question is this, how are others connecting to windows
servers and developing PHP/ZF applications and what IDEs do they
use and what connection protocol does your organization allow?
Also, on a side note, does anyone know of a tool that will allow me
to easily package and migrate my application from development
server ---> QA server ----> finally the two load balanced
production server? The old method of connecting to all three via
SMB and using the drag and drop method is getting old and I want to
minimize downtime. Right now I can do each front-end independently,
but there is about a 5-10 second lag until our load balancer
detects the 500 error, and sends traffic to the other front-end,
when I copy the folders over. I guess it ultimately comes down to,
is there an rsync equivalent to windows if so, what is it?
Thank you,
Henry
