prodigitalson wrote:
# ability to persist alternate namings of things
# ability to scan existing projects (lower priority, and harder to do)
# ability to use alternate config type (moderate complexity, low priority)
Its ironic that the 3 things i want/use most are not complete and have been
ranked low in priority. Not that im complaining pre se, Id agree in
comparison to the things you have implemented/fixed they are indeed low
priority. I just like to whine without contributing :-)
Awesome work though. things are shaping up nicely id say.
The alternate naming facilities are in place, the only problem is that
nothing exposes them yet (this is a matter of finding the use case).
The only use case that myself and Benjamin came up with was to let thing
work with existing project... which brings me to the next point.
Existing projects are higher on my list now that all other new features
are out the door. As you can imagine, scanning files and determining
their context is not an easy task. I'll start thinking about this.
Alternate config type- by this I assume you mean XML?
-ralph
