No problem, we all have them ;).

Matthew Weier O'Phinney has just given a really good webinar on just
this topic, it takes a bit to wrap your head around, heres a link to
the recording:

http://www.zend.com/en/resources/webinars/framework

Good luck :)






2009/12/18 Mike A <[email protected]>
>
> On 18 Dec 2009 at 20:42, Daniel Latter wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What do you mean " many ids with productid produces validation error "? It 
> > is left upto
> > the coder to set a unique id for each element? What are you trying to do, 
> > may be it wil shed more
> > light?
> >
> > Also, if im not mistaken both the examples you refer to are the same? are 
> > you trying to
> > dosomthing like this:
> >
> > .. id="producid_11" .. ?
>
> Yes - my bad. I used Nabble for the first post, it took out some of my text. 
> Then my brain
> went daft on the required example.
>
> By validation I'm referring to markup. As sson as I read your reply I 
> realised I had not passed
> id value to the form. Been at this too long today - 14 hours :(
>
> Also, trying to get pretty markup via decorator - it's driving me nuts!
>
> Many thanks Dan
>
> > Thanks
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > 2009/12/18 Mike A <[email protected]>
> >     Apologies - my previous post did not format correctly, so I repeat.
> >
> > When constructing a form element I use this...
> >
> >    $this->addElement('hidden', 'productId', array(
> >      'decorators' => array(array('ViewHelper'),
> >                    array('HtmlTag', array('tag' => 'p')),
> >                    ),
> >    ));
> >
> > which formats as html (precisely) this way...
> >
> >     <p>
> >     <input type="hidden" name="productId" value="11" id="productId" /></p>
> >
> >
> > There are two problems with this. First, many input ids with "productId" 
> > produces a validation
> > error. Second, mark-up format is wrong. What must I do to produce this 
> > (with value added to
> > id)...
> >
> >      <p>
> >      <input type="hidden" name="productId" value="11" id="productId" />
> >      </p>
> >
> >     TIA...
> >
> >     Mike
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to