Yeah, caching is a good idea. Regards, Saša Stamenković
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Konr Ness [via Zend Framework Community] < [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]> > wrote: > I use XML. I haven't found that it's particularly slow, but if you're > really concerned about speed, you should cache the Zend_Navigation object. > > Konr > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:47 AM, umpirsky <[hidden > email]<http://n4.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1473974&i=0> > > wrote: > >> >> I wonder, what is the right config type for navigation, xml or ini. What >> is >> faster? What do you use? >> >> I find xml more easy to maintain and write, but I already have >> application.ini. I also think ini is faster for parsing, and for better >> performances it's maybe better to have on ini instead xml for navigation >> and >> ini for the rest of the config. >> >> Or it is maybe better to have one xml config file? >> >> What do you think? >> >> Regards, >> Sasa Stamenkovic. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n4.nabble.com/Zend-Navigation-xml-or-ini-tp1472773p1472773.html >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > ------------------------------ > View message @ > http://n4.nabble.com/Zend-Navigation-xml-or-ini-tp1472773p1473974.html > To unsubscribe from Zend_Navigation xml or ini, click here< (link removed) > ==>. > > > -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Zend-Navigation-xml-or-ini-tp1472773p1473996.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
