Nice to have. Regards, Saša Stamenković
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Shaun Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > Steven, > I would like to see this too! > I like Zend_VersionControl_* > > Look forward to see it something. > > Shaun J. Farrell > Washington, DC > (202) 713-5241 > www.farrelley.com > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Danny Fröberg < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Steven, >> >> Yes would love to have it, use case could be for having self updating apps >> deployed. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Danny >> >> >> >> *From:* Steven Brown [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* den 18 mars 2010 22:59 >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [fw-general] Would anyone want Zend_VersionControl_Subversion? >> >> >> >> For fun, I began experimenting with putting together a PHP implementation >> of a Subversion client that uses the svn protocol and thought it might be a >> useful addition to ZF. >> >> >> >> Bill Karwin pointed out that a PECL extension already exists to provide >> this functionality, though the documentation is filled with warnings about >> it being experimental. >> >> >> >> I suggest that it is possible in some hosting environments that developers >> won’t have the PECL extension installed and may not be able to install it. >> >> >> >> Some uses for such a module include: >> >> >> >> 1. Deployment – code can be installed or updated using PHP code >> >> 2. Repository browsing – for tools such as bug/issue trackers >> >> 3. Committing – for example if files can be changed in an admin >> area, the changes can be committed to the repository >> >> >> >> I think it should be possible to provide similar functionality for Git, >> Mercurial, and other version control systems. >> >> >> >> I have already started developing an adapter that uses the svn protocol, >> but others could be created that use SSH or LDAP/HTTP access, or the PECL >> extension. >> >> >> >> Would Zend_VersionControl_Subversion be useful or is it just a waste of >> time? >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Steven >> > >
