Hello Christian,
> Debugging. With the database, all your sessions for that one
> application are in one place. You can see if for example you made a
> mistake and it just accumulates sessions like crazy. Also you can
> easier get access to the data and then analyze whats happening.
As soon as I am setting different session save path per application I
guess I'm playing the same game. Or am I not?
> Security. Your sessions are yours, not shared with potentially other
> users on the very same box that might "guess" your session id. Highly
> unlikely, but theoretically possible. It's less likely if your
> database is properly secured.
I'm not sure I understand. Are you talking about filesystem security
("...other users on the same box...")?
Thanks,
M.
> Thats my 2c
>
> Greetings,
> Christian Riesen
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Marian Meres <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is not really ZF related, but I hope you don't mind more generic
>> question.
>>
>> I've never used any other session save handler than the native php
>> one. As far as I know it raises concerns only related to a) the disk
>> read/write security and/or b) potential load balancing problems (sync
>> between servers and session save paths). I am OK with those.
>> Application issues such as "number of active users" are no problem as
>> well. I would guess the native one is also more performant (perhaps
>> not true if there are "thousands+" of active sessions).
>>
>> Are you aware of anything else I should take into account?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> m.
>>
>