Thank you Hector for your suggestion, it helped me. I thought there was some sort of self-recognition in ZF by calling the file with that name.
And also I use bootstrap resource a lot and I like them so much. Bye! Sergio Rinaudo > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:57:44 -0700 > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Best practice with routes management using separate > .ini > > I suggest creating a new bootstrap resource plugin by the same name > "router", extend the ZF one, and add your own logic to pull the config from > a separate file. > > Something like this should do the trick: > > http://pastie.org/2377345 > > Then update your application.ini with this line: > > resources.router.configPath = APPLICATION_PATH "/configs/routes.ini" > > The benefit is that you can still leverage the logic in the original ZF > router bootstrap resource plugin and pretty much copy/paste the routes from > application.ini to routes.ini. Just remove "resources." from the beginning > of each line. > > I hope this helps! > > -- > *Hector Virgen* > http://www.virgentech.com > Follow me on Twitter: @djvirgen <http://twitter.com/djvirgen> > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sergio Rinaudo > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > in my ZF project I have lots of different routes that now are defined > > within the application.ini using the "resources.router", > > resources.router.routes.login.* for example . > > > > Searching on the web I found that some people are using a separate ini file > > only for routes, called route.ini or routes.ini, omitting the > > "resources.router" part when adding a route. > > > > So my questions are: > > > > - is it a good practice to store route configuration in a separate file? > > - is there a standard name for this file? > > - how and where load it? > > - I've already an idea about the above questions answers, so I give it a > > try, and loading the routes with "resources.router" throws a > > Zend_Controller_Router_Exception 'No route configuration in section > > 'routes'', why? > > > > Thanks to everyone will help me to make it clear. > > > > Regards > > > > Sergio Rinaudo > >
