-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >When we're pushing over http, we have to make this modification. I >don't see that fwknopd allows for that modification when checking for >base64 only chars.
So, I finally dug deep enough into the code to discover how it's done. - From what I can tell, I was wrong in my understanding. Fwknopd seems to correctly parse base64 for url. - From what I can tell, when fwknopd sniffs an interface using pcap, it only sniffs once per second. When the traffic volume is much higher than that, packets may get lost. I believe that there was a lot of traffic on the port I was using when I was doing this testing. I disabled the sleep command in the pcap_loop subroutine, and it started picking up every SPA packet. In short, I have concluded that my problem was that I was testing on a heavily used port, and fwknopd was dropping packets because of the heavy use. Is this a bug or a feature? It takes more processor time when it doesn't sleep between loops, but I would like to always grab the SPA packets. Thanks, Jonathan Bennett incomsystems.biz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrmcZUACgkQhFXk1UR7WbdvbQCfRDMCzNUG6Cf1FFCmSuHvfD0z GZUAn2HiEhYelg4zmsMzIQB8rziysjMQ =9d39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Fwknop-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwknop-discuss
