On Mar 19, 2012, Poignant Murf wrote:
> 1st and most importantly thankyou for fwknop it's ~£{?|£|\ awesome
Thanks - glad you like fwknop.
> 2nd confirming that only one FORCE_NAT option allowed for each access.conf
> stanza - and since most of my networks are NAT possibility of changing the
> setup in the future to 'FORCE_NAT <source port> <NAT ip address> <NAT port>'
> which would allow multiple NAT statements for stanza
Interesting idea - use the source port to differentiate. I've added a ticket
on this through github.
> 3rd is just a query - has anyone had any success with using a version 1.9
> fwknop client knocking into a version 2 server - keeping defaults on both
> ATM and key file accross 1.9 and 2 client so password not my issue - figure I
> need to change something in the .fwknoprc file on the client - error is
> 'error creating fko context: decryption failed or decryption data is invalid'
> as i still support clients and servers running the version 1.9 would be handy
For the 1.9 client, have you installed the FKO perl extension by chance?
This uses libfko in order to build SPA packets, and allows the older perl
code to continue to function. Another possibility might be to switch to
using gpg to encrypt/decrypt SPA packets.
--Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Fwknop-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwknop-discuss
