Many of you will never see the issues involved with a 16bit or other
subnet on a Class A (8bit reserved) local area network that I have.
There are arguments and then there are facts.  Facts first.


1. The lowest common denominator in a network is what dictates the
network architecture.
2. The IP stack in many industrial systems has a limited scope.
3. A 16bit subnet in a Class A 8bit space is technically possible.

In the first item I mention that devices attached or part of the
network can create the logical limits that the network can operate on.
  From computers to switching equipment there are devices that will
not _respect_ or pass on the data in the same form.  For example in a
wireless or fiber optic setup if both ends of termination are mis
configured to "Auto Duplex" a race or fall back position will occur
where the connection appears to operate _most_ of the time while it
attempts to decide if its peer is full or half duplex.

The second item continues the first with an example where in small
routers and embedded devices which have limits or errors in the
addressing scope.  So, for example, a Allen Bradly Serial to Ethernet
converter can have any addressing scheme applied to it, however it can
only do the calculations for a 24bit network no mater how it is
configured and this behaviour is documented in the manual.  Newer
versions have fixed this issue but it is a great example where
manufacturing businesses keep machines in production far after their
recommended life.

In the third item the irony shows up.  Technically it will work _most_
of the time.  I have worked with companies that just happen to own
(and quickly dispose of) equipment that will not allow these subnets.
Remember that we are all at the mercy of the manufactures as the
lowest common denominator of a standard.  So something like this
Standard / Manufacturer Implementation = Actual Operation


Arguments

"It works with most of my systems so I think your wrong" - Customer
who ended up paying me a lot of money.
"The sales man said it would work" - Customer who ended up paying me a
lot of money.
"Thats how the other consultant did it." - Customer who ended up
paying me a lot of money.
"Production is down because of your complaints, not because of the
MPLS Ethernet setup" - Customer who ended up paying me a _ton_ of
money.

Look for the recurring concept.......

I know that companies and organizations will continue to use
addressing that _looks_ or _feels_ right.   Remember that the _looks_
and _feels_ can bite you later.


</rant>

Thank you automatic spell check.... :P

-- 
Andrew "lathama" Latham

TuxTone Inc.
http://TuxTone.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Fwlug mailing list
[email protected]
http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org

Reply via email to