Actually, it turns out I was a bit premature in asking. It seems to be working just fine after tweaking moblock a little.
Also, there was an issue of the Hardy version of moblock temporarily being abandoned until the maintainer realized it was LTS and messing some people up. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jonathan Bartels <[email protected]> > To: Fort Wayne Linux Users Group <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:16:00 -0400 > Subject: Re: [fwlug] moblock/blockcontrol and TOR > I had to look it up: http://moblock.berlios.de/README-0.8 > > How is moblock not just another front end to iptables? > > If it's iptables based there should be info about iptables and tor readily > available. > > Rob Ludwick wrote: > >> I investigated moblock recently. I don't recommend anything like that >> on the kernel level, for the very reason you're finding out. >> >> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:18 -0400, Michael Kerney wrote: >> >> >>> Does anyone know what allow settings I should use in moblock to allow >>> TOR to go about its business? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fwlug mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org >> >>
_______________________________________________ Fwlug mailing list [email protected] http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org
