Uri wrote:
> i still think isa is a (sic) concept that is important enough to
> cover on its own. sure it is a set but a very specific type
> with its own name. the names of these concepts are important
> (almost like design patterns which i despise :).
If names are that important to you, then you should use the right
ones. I've never seen this set membership test thing you've
illustrated called "isa". To most programmers, "isa" means
something else. Oops - s/else/different/; sorry. ;-)
--
jdp
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
