>>>>> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> even better than just be a poorly written constructor is that it is >> inside a 'factory' module that is inherited by 80 other modules!! MGS> If that's an example of "poorly written" code in your project, MGS> can I come work there? It at least gets it right, if verbosely. well it is a live system so it must be 'right'. i was hired to review it and the double copy of the hash data is what bothers me. as this is called zillions of times by all those modules it is a quick and easy speedup. and they are hiring more outsource indians so you won't be contacted. :( MGS> sub new { MGS> my $class = shift; MGS> return bless( [EMAIL PROTECTED], $class ); MGS> } my clean version is: sub new { my ( $class, %self ) = @_ ; return bless \%self, $class ; } i don't like using shift for args if i can help it. MGS> sub new [EMAIL PROTECTED],shift} that is the same as my shorter golf answer. maybe i counted mine wrong. MGS> sub new {$a=shift;[EMAIL PROTECTED],$a} MGS> 21. And it's even strict clean. :) that is nice. the other replies beat it though! uri -- Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com --Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org