> >> While doing some tests/research on secret operators, I stumbled upon >> this >> one in my one-liners: >> >> ~~<> >> >> Obviously, this should be named "the sperm operator". >> Looks more like a "kite" operator to me. > Does that mean I have a dirty mind?
At least not dirtier than the inventor of the =()= (unless that was you ;)
... anyway I think it'll be adopted better as "kite", and well also, where
did you see a four-squared sperm? :)
--
Sincerely,
Dmitry Karasik
