I have an old Wallstreet that I am trying to bring back to life. Family number: M4753. In a future posting, I'll be asking about how to format the hard drive, etc., but that's not the topic of this posting...

I'm sure we're all familiar with the phenomenon of "Code Bloating", where when an Application Program or Operating System goes through a major revision, the length of it's source and/or executable code gets larger with each revision. (Ever heard of Microsoft?) The end result with "Code Bloating" is that each version requires more and more hardware/horsepower in order to run at the same apparent speed as the previous version did on its own hardware. I've sort of (and I emphasis SORT OF) been told that this is not true between at least two versions of OS X. Can anyone verify this in any way? In other words:


- Given the same obsolete hardware (and the XPostFacto software add-on):
 -- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.3?
 -- Is 10.3 faster or slower than 10.4?
 -- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.4?


Thanks much,         LP


p.s.: I assume that all of you already know about it, but just-in-case, here's a link for XPostFacto:
http://eshop.macsales.com/OSXCenter/XPostFacto/Framework.cfm?page=XPostFacto.html
.



--
G-Books is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
-- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

     Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

G-Books list info:      <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-books.html>
 --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:G-Books@mail.maclaunch.com>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-books%40mail.maclaunch.com/>



---------------------------------------------------------------
iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com
---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to