A historical approach to the debate
by Hannibal 
Framing the Debate
The majority of today's processors can't rightfully be called completely RISC 
or completely CISC. The two textbook architectures have evolved towards each 
other to such an extent that there's no longer a clear distinction between 
their respective approaches to increasing performance and efficiency. To be 
specific, chips that implement the x86 CISC ISA have come to look a lot like 
chips that implement various RISC ISA's; the instruction set architecture is 
the same, but under the hood it's a whole different ball game. But this 
hasn't been a one-way trend. Rather, the same goes for today's so-called RISC 
CPUs. They've added more instructions and more complexity to the point where 
they're every bit as complex as their CISC counterparts. Thus the "RISC vs. 
CISC" debate really exists only in the minds of marketing departments and 
platform advocates whose purpose in creating and perpetuating this fictitious 
conflict is to promote their pet product by means of name-calling and 
sloganeering. 

http://www.arstechnica.com/cpu/4q99/risc-cisc/rvc-1.html

-- 
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
 -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! 
<http://www.applelinks.com>

Reply via email to