Re: ! FileMaker 2 or 4 ??? Kinda URGENT...

[Maaki]

My guess would be to use FM 4.1, since it has some relational 
capabilities, and FM 2 is flat file only. However that is only a 
guess, since I don't use FM. There are some good FM lists though 
where you should get some very knowledgeable responses.

To subscribe, E-mail to:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archives:<http://www.listsearch.com/fmprotalk.lasso>
         =====================================
 ---At 4:21 PM +0100 12/4/04, Larry le Mac wrote:---
A few weeks ago I asked about FM II and newer versions.
I have now located FileMaker 2 Pro which can convert the
database file intact. However, I have a problem:
Which is the best, and why:
FileMaker 2 Pro or FileMaker 4.1 Pro running on an
iMac rev. B with Mac OS 9.2.2 ?????
--
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |
     Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
 --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com