----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [Megillot] Redating the Dead Sea Scroll Deposits
> Plus, if I > recall our Nov. 2002 conversations correctly, Rachel--with whom I dug at > Sepphoris--clearly agreed with the dating of first century CE Qumran deposits. That is, by paleographic means, possible only for 2Q12, 3Q02, 3Q09, 5Q03-21, 6Q05-6, 6Q11-16,11Q10, 11Q17 and 11Q19A, whereas it remains high questionable for 4Q180, 4Q261, 4Q269, 4Q271, 4Q286-90, 4Q489 and 4Q490. 7Q stuff i'd like to factor out. A comparatively meager result, I believe. BTW The C14-method is just a tool among others - no ultima ratio. And Hull's results are not that new. Dierk _______________________________________________ g-Megillot mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
