Quoted from Jim Davila's today report: "xQpapEnoch, since they are confident it comes from a Qumran cave, but they don't know which one, and (unusually for a Qumran scroll and uniquely for a Qumran Enoch manuscript) it's written on papyrus rather than leather."
Well, not that unsual, see: 4QpapJub ! Apparently, the new fragment is the papyrus complement to 4QEn(a) = 4Q201 col iv frag f+h (cp En 8.3-94; Milik 157f. 342f.). Do we know if the conjecture belongs to line 11 of the above, i.e. "[the soul of man]" or something alike? _dierk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 4:26 PM Subject: [Megillot] new Aramaic Enoch fragment > > Jim Davila reports today (22 Nov) some more information on the "new" ancient > papyrus fragment of Aramaic 1 Enoch. At: > http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com > > Stephen Goranson > > _______________________________________________ > g-Megillot mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot > > _______________________________________________ g-Megillot mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
