No - it's just an inductive argument, first made by Stegemann, if memory serves.

_Dierk



----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: [Megillot] the teacher and the high priest?



It has sometimes been stated that the "teacher of righteousness" had either
served as the high priest or had expected to be named the high priest. Is
there good reason to state that?


best,
Stephen Goranson
_______________________________________________
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot




_______________________________________________
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot

Reply via email to