|
Dierk,
<
Russell, on the identifiable masonry as Roman, cf. G.A. Smith_ Jerusalem, The topography, economics and history from the earliest times to A.D. 70, vol. II, p. 425, #1, London 1907 > I haven't found Smith's 1907 book on Jerusalem available locally,
but a later edition of his Historical Geography of the Holy Land recognizes the
castle and caves at Araq el-Emir as having been constructed by Hyrkanus the
Tobiad in the 170s BCE (see p. 384 and note). The castle is now
"without controversy" dated by archaeologists to the Hellenistic period on
architectural grounds based on its alternate binder-stretcher construction as
well as its Hellenistic architectural ornamentation. While the site
of Araq el-Emir contains both Hellenistic and Roman era pottery fragments, its
architectural remains are restricted to the Hellenistic and Byzantine
periods. I would speculate based on more recent publications on Araq
el-Emir that the Roman masonry was either misidentified in Smith or
(less likely) refers to structures in the nearby village rather than the castle
itself. But thanks for the bibliography - I will track it down and read it
with interest.
< 1QM is not to be brought into a serekh line with 1QS, 1QSa and 1QSb, neither systematically nor terminologically - not even sociologically. Otherwise any taktika written at any time would be related to the yachad, btw. Albeit the fact that all orders are derivatives of basic conflict solutions, Schiffman is apparently not familiar with the traditional roots - and only that's important here - of the military orders in 1QM... >
These comments don't correspond with the analysis in Schiffman's book,
which show close correspondences in laws found in the texts under discussion and
doesn't address itself to military matters. I cannot agree with your
assertion that the serekh terminology in 1QM does not link it to the
other Serekh texts.
I'll discuss the location of Daphne near Antioch in 2 Maccabees in a
separate thread.
Best regards,
Russell Gmirkin
|
- Re: [Megillot] Jewish Iliad or Oddity? RUSSELLGMIRKIN
- Re: [Megillot] Jewish Iliad or Oddity? Dierk van den Berg
- Re: [Megillot] Jewish Iliad or Oddity? RUSSELLGMIRKIN
- Re: [Megillot] Jewish Iliad or Oddity? Dierk van den Berg
- Re: [Megillot] Jewish Iliad or Oddity? RUSSELLGMIRKIN
