At 5:29 AM -0500 10/25/2008, Kris Tilford wrote: >Ars Technica recently had an article comparing Adobe Flash Player >versions 9 & 10.
That's how I found Flash 10 in the first place. :\ >They covered a lot of territory for both PCs and Macs, but their >only Mac benchmarks were for Intel Macs. I posted a request for PPC >benchmarks, and low and behold, they were produced. I'm so used to "OS X is OS X", it didn't even occur to me there'd be such differences. Glad you caught it! Thanks! >It appears the new Flash 10 is both slower and more resource >intensive than the older Flash 9, so those of you who haven't >upgraded may want to consider these results before taking the plunge. yea. At this point, between the cpu pig-out and the instabilities (definitely a BIG memory leak), I *strongly* recommend sticking to 9.0.124.0 - the regular ppc version, not the ub. The ub seems more crashy than the ppc. FWIW, - Dan. -- - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
