Kris Tilford wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
>   
>> Ummm, why would you want to scrap out perfectly good usable monitors
>> just so you could spend money on an LCD?
>>     
>
> Sometimes spending money actually saves money. In the case of LCD  
> monitors, the payback period in electricity saving is enough to pay  
> for the monitor.
>
> While Bruce may have pointed out that health concerns over EMF are not  
> statistically proven, the converse is also true, they are not  
> statistically disproved. It is a fact that most forms of  
> electromagnetic radiation DO have biological effect, and large,  
> statistically valid samples have shown that cancers such as skin  
> cancer ARE correlated DIRECTLY to exposure levels. We know the inverse  
> square law applies, and that people tend to sit very close to their  
> monitors. The EU computer safety whitepaper has studied this subject  
> recommended a safe viewing distance of 86cm, which is substantially  
> further away than most CRT users sit.
>
> I've inherited an old 1970's Ford LTD with a big 500 ci engine that  
> gets about 6 mpg. It too is "perfectly good usable", but it wastes  
> money in gas, pollutes the air, and carries enough momentum to kill  
> people driving more fuel efficient vehicles if there were an accident.  
> I can't justify ever using this vehicle again, and I don't feel  
> comfortable selling it, so it's headed to the recycler even though  
> it's "perfectly good". Your free, disposed of, CRTs are not an example  
> of a efficient use of recycling. Rather it shows the laziness of the  
> average citizen, placing a CRT in a dumpster rather than recycling it.  
> And you, to cheap to do yourself a favor, there are new LCDs for less  
> than $100, buy one, IT PAYS FOR ITSELF! Society as a whole is better  
> served with your CRTs in the landfill than with them in use. They're  
> digging coal in Wyoming and shipping it on a smokey diesel train to  
> Missouri and burning it releasing tons of CO2 into the atmosphere so  
> that you can waste energy with an antiquated CRT monitor that possibly  
> harms your health in other ways. There was a reason the monitor was in  
> the trash, and it has nothing to do with whether or not it's  
> "perfectly good usable". It's always about money. They're saving money  
> by throwing the CRT away. You're wasting money by using it.
>
>   
I take it that Kris is volunteering to buy everyone that wants one, a 
lcd monitor.   So how do you want us to do it buy it and bill it to 
you.  Or do you want to buy it and ship to us.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to