> Leopard isn't Vista, but it's the first OS X edition to go slower on
> PPC Macs than it's predecessor. On Intel Macs Leopard actually runs
> faster than Tiger, so go figure?
I found that the Leopard is optimized for X86 Macs, using mostly X86
coding
whereas the 10.4.11 Tiger is optimized for PowerPC Macs. using mostly
PPC coding.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
