I don't know for sure, but up until recently there has been so few 64 bit applications out there to make it largely irrelevant until fairly recently.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, ah...clem <boneheads...@gmail.com> wrote: > i've just been informed by a reliable source that OSX is a 32-bit > operating system, and because of that, no application can address more > than 2GB of RAM. if this is true, i am shocked. WTF is going on at > apple?? hyping 64-bit hardware for the past seven years and loading > it with a 32-bit OS??? can anyone confirm or refute this assertion? > > -- > You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for > those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power > Macs. > The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette > guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml > To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list > -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
