At 5:07 AM -0600 10/24/2010, James Therrault wrote:
When the PowerPC alliance dropped the ball (inability to produce faster PowerPC G4 processors for laptops), Apple jumped ship by switching to Intel's new Core architecture.

Don'tcha mean G5?

The roadmap called for both the G4 and G5 to progress. The G5 was really targeted toward desktop and server type machines, that had the available power and room for giant heat sinks. The G4 (7450) was the laptop chip that stalled out hard.

Interesting, but I still think that Apple dropped the ball with regard to option to power sucking G5 chips for laptops. Neither IBM or Motorola could do it but maybe a special arrangement with other Intel competitors to work on a low power PPC such as AMD could have proven fruitful.

hah. No way would Big Blue ever license the Power architecture to the likes of Intel or AMD!!!!

Apple had little to do with things, back in the day. It was the IBM / Motorola / Freescale collective that was designing and producing the chips. Their sales to Apple were so trivial that Apple basically had no influence. Ultimately, they went in the direction best for them... IBM put their efforts in the real Power chips. Moto/Freescale went for the embedded processor market. And Apple switched to the lemming platform.

Power technology is now way up there with regards to clock speed supporting multiple cores.

Yea. We call that Defeat Snatched From The Jaws of Victory. ... which of course brings us back the old argument of wanting that robust build of OS X, that runs on Intel x86, AMD x86, ARM, and Power.

- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to