At 8:50 PM -0700 10/24/2010, Joshua Juran wrote:
The Core 2 Duo was a real performance boost comparted to the PowerPC G4 which
was stuck at 1.5 GHz. I know, witch third party CPU upgrades 2 GHz is possible
without overclocking - altough I'm not sure if they aren't overclocked by
default?

My recollection from the WWDC 2006 presentation is that multiple cores have gone mainstream as an alternative to increasing clock speed.

I always liked that POV; a good rationalization. The reality is a bit more complicated, and had nothing to do with clock speed.

Realize that clock speed loses much of its meaning when you consider pipelining and parallelism within the processor. The general public never really understood that, tho, due to the players using clock speed as the big marketing metric. Then it was made more complicated by certain companies advertising their computer's speed by adding all the clock speeds of each processor! Yea, my car does 240mph on the big highway because it has four wheels!

The BIG push for multi-core processors was by the US Gov't -- tech's biggest customer. Uncle needs 'em for, um, certain types of big, um, vector type calculations.

After some tech failures, Moore's Law was upheld. Big big gains were made toward reducing the size of the gates on the chips, which in turn meant that chips could be smaller, use less power, and produce less heat. But smaller chips presented packaging problems! So if you keep the chips big, what do you do with the extra real estate???? You make ASICs and SoC and, oh, just put more Stuff on it... More cache, memory controllers, and all sorts of auxiliary processors! Cores!

- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to