On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Al Poulin wrote: > On Nov 23, 2:22 pm, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I expect that if OpenOffice is useful or profitable for Oracle, they'll >> continue to develop and market it. I welcome any competition for Microsoft. >> It will be the Safe, Bean counter-approved version with per-seat licensing >> and service contracts and the official stamp of Corporate Approval. >> >> LibreOffice will be the choice of the Holy OSS Faithful. Maybe we'll even >> get some more competition as the forks diverge. > > So where would that leave NeoOffice for individual users?
Given that OO and LibreOffice now have native Mac interfaces, I don't know. The raison d' etre of NeoOffice was to get Open Office in a form that wasn't a horrible X-Windows program. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
