At 5:01 PM +0100 2/10/2011, J.M.P.Hissel wrote:
Just 2 weeks ago I composed my QS 800/'02 as follows:
HD 75 GB with 10.4.11 and 9.2.2 in the lower bay
HD 75 GB with 10.5.8 in the upper bay
HD 115 GB for storage in the Zip bay
PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-116D
1,5 GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX with TwinView conn.to a LaCie electr22b3
ATY,Rage128 conn.to a DELL E196FP
PCI 1799/ USB-2
All is working flawlessly. But Tiger is much snappier and faster than
Leopard on this Mac.
With Spotlight indexing enabled or ?
...Leopard does a lot of background preview generation and such.
I've run into a number of systems that felt more sluggish than Tiger,
until those processes finished. I worry that people make snap
performance judgements without taking that into account. Leopard's
kernel really is faster than Tiger's. It's the add-ons that slow
things.
- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
