Bugs item #1680857, was opened at 2007-03-14 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bharat
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100235&aid=1680857&group_id=235
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: win32
Group: 2.0.0 beta 6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Ben (sp00kz)
Assigned to: Daniel Atallah (datallah)
Summary: Memory leak in gaim-2.0.0beta6
Initial Comment:
There seems to be a memory leak in gaim-2.0.0beta6 that does not effect
usability, but continues to eat up resources until the system starts paging.
Windows XP SP2 Fully Patched, Gaim Idles at ~30 MB ram until you start IM'ing
people, and then ive seen it go all the way up to 400+MB.
4msn accounts, 3aim, doesn't seem to matter which sorting method (there use to
be a leak with sort by log size) or which account has the Messaging window
open.
Reverted to gaim-2.0.0beta5 and this seemed to fix the problem, but AIM
accounts showed up as '(unknown) account type' until you reset them.
Any other info I can provide?
Thanks
Ben
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bharat Mediratta (bharat)
Date: 2007-03-16 23:22
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=42211
Originator: NO
I'm seeing the same behavior with 2.0.0beta6 on WinXP. Right now, my Mem
Usage is at 77M and my VM Size is 630M. Let me know if there's any other
useful info I can provide.
Debugging Information
Plugins: Enabled
SSL: Gaim was compiled with SSL support.
GTK+ Runtime: 2.10.7
Glib Runtime: 2.12.7
Library Support
Cyrus SASL: Disabled
Gadu-Gadu library (libgadu): Internal
GtkSpell: Enabled
GnuTLS: Disabled
Network Security Services (NSS): Enabled
Perl: Enabled
Tcl: Enabled
Tk: Enabled
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ben (sp00kz)
Date: 2007-03-16 07:20
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=944565
Originator: YES
When I reverted, i used the same GTK+ Version, 2.10.7
Tab placement is 'on top'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Daniel Atallah (datallah)
Date: 2007-03-14 13:41
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=325843
Originator: NO
Are you using the same GTK+ version as beta6 (2.10.7) (Help-About) when
you revert to beta5?
Do you have your Tab Placement somewhere other than "on top"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ben (sp00kz)
Date: 2007-03-14 10:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=944565
Originator: YES
Assigned Group
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100235&aid=1680857&group_id=235
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Gaim-bugs mailing list
Gaim-bugs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-bugs
