On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Zhihao Yuan <lich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Yann Leboulanger <aste...@lagaule.org> 
> wrote:
>> On 04/11/2011 06:56 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Yann Leboulanger<aste...@lagaule.org>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 04/11/2011 06:41 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How about this? I used thread module instead of threading.
>>>>> Tested, OK.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It must not be the correct file, no thread in this file
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> I did 2 things:
>>> 1. Uses gajim.thread_interface
>>> 2. Make gajim.thread_interface uses thread module instead of
>>> threading, since we don't need the advanced features in threading, and
>>> the thread module is faster.
>>>
>>> Please take a look at my patch in previous email first.
>>
>> In the last mail with a file attached, there is no threading code. You must
>> have attached the wrong file
>
> I'm so sorry!... I used a patch under another path.

I have tested this patch (attached correctly in my previous email)
under my Archlinux box where `aplay` is not available. Everything
works fine.

>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Zhihao Yuan
> The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
>

-- 
Zhihao Yuan
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
_______________________________________________
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel

Reply via email to