Sonali Amonkar wrote:
> On further digging, we found that the script is failing in the following part 
> of $GALAXY_HOME/lib/galaxy/jobs/runners/
>         # submit
>         galaxy_job_id = job_wrapper.job_id
>         log.debug("(%s) submitting file %s" % ( galaxy_job_id, job_file ) )
>         log.debug("(%s) command is: %s" % ( galaxy_job_id, command_line ) )
>         job_id = pbs.pbs_submit(c, job_attrs, job_file, pbs_queue_name, None)

This is the line here, it's failing to submit the job.

>         pbs.pbs_disconnect(c)
>         # check to see if it submitted
>         if not job_id:
>             errno, text = pbs.error()
>             log.debug( "(%s) pbs_submit failed, PBS error %d: %s" % 
> (galaxy_job_id, errno, text) )
>    "Unable to run this job due to a cluster error" 
> )
>             return
> Could this be a problem related to the pbs_python egg (v. pbs_python-4.1.0) 
> being used by Galaxy or a Torque-specific issue? Just to reiterate, we are on 
> a development snapshot of Torque which is hard to replace as many other 
> people using it.

It's possible that pbs_python is generating code which is incompatible,
but since it's linked against your version of TORQUE this should not be
the case.

It's hard to say exactly what's causing this since it's outside of
Galaxy.  I'm not sure if TORQUE has any client-side debugging that would
help with this issue but that's where I'd start.

> Also, could you please advise which Torque & pbs_python version combinations 
> have you successfully tested against?

We're using an older version (2.1.11) on our submission hosts since we
saw performance problems when using pbs_python with the newer 2.4.x

The TORQUE server and execution hosts run 2.4.9.

> Regards,
> Sonali
> PS: pbs_python has a new version 4.3 out 
> (, why is this 
> not in the PSU egg repository yet? Would that make a difference?

I'm not sure if it would make a difference.  I upgrade the pbs_python
egg as necessary or when it's particularly far out of date.

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the
interface at:

Reply via email to